Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD FireStream 9250

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
3296 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +719%
8.192 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jun 2008
Pirate Islands
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
10
4096
Shading Units
800
256
TMUs
40
64
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
RV770
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Board Design

175W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy