Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 127.0GB/s)
3856 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 219W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +1217%
8.192 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Feb 2010
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1134 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
896MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
448bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
127.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
4096
Shading Units
240
256
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.72 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.64 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
219W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
G92B
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
G92-421-B1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy