CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB
VS
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Lower TDP (175W vs 290W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (608.3GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano
8.192 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB
+165%
21.75 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano
VS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Unknown
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 30
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1575 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1188 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR6X
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
608.3GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
48
64
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
6144
256
TMUs
192
64
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
169.9 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
339.8 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.75 TFLOPS
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
21.75 TFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
339.8 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Fiji
GPU Name
GA104
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
GA104-401-A1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Board Design
175W
TDP
290W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.3
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce G100 OEM
2
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI Radeon HD 3850 X3
3
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD FirePro W2100
4
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA TITAN Ada
5
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 X2
6
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon Pro V520
7
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
8
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce G100 OEM
9
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI FirePro V7770
10
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2
Related News
1
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
2
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
3
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
4
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
5
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
6
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
7
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
8
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
9
AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly
10
NVIDIA to Ramp Up Orders and Add New Suppliers to Meet Explosive Demand for Blackwell Products
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy