AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

VS

AMD Radeon R9 Nano NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages

Lower TDP (175W vs 320W)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 's Advantages

Released 7 years and 1 months late

Boost Clock2505MHz

More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (716.8GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)

5632 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Radeon R9 Nano

8.192 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 4080 +494%

48.74 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

Radeon R9 Nano

4607

GeForce RTX 4080 +513%

28257

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Radeon R9 Nano

28

GeForce RTX 4080 +371%

132

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Radeon R9 Nano

60

GeForce RTX 4080 +310%

246

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Radeon R9 Nano

75

GeForce RTX 4080 +300%

300

Radeon R9 Nano

VS

GeForce RTX 4080

Graphics Card

Aug 2015

Release Date

Sep 2022

Pirate Islands

Generation

GeForce 40

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

2205 MHz

-

Boost Clock

2505 MHz

500 MHz

Memory Clock

1400 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

16GB

HBM

Memory Type

GDDR6X

4096bit

Memory Bus

256bit

512.0GB/s

Bandwidth

716.8GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

76

64

Compute Units

-

4096

Shading Units

9728

256

TMUs

304

64

ROPs

112

-

Tensor Cores

304

-

RT Cores

76

16 KB (per CU)

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

2 MB

L2 Cache

64 MB

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

280.6 GPixel/s

256.0 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

761.5 GTexel/s

8.192 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

48.74 TFLOPS

8.192 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

48.74 TFLOPS

512.0 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

761.5 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Fiji

GPU Name

AD103

Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)

GPU Variant

AD103-300-A1

GCN 3.0

Architecture

Ada Lovelace

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

28 nm

Process Size

5 nm

8.9 billion

Transistors

45.9 billion

596 mm²

Die Size

379 mm²

Board Design

175W

TDP

320W

450 W

Suggested PSU

700 W

1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

1x 8-pin

Power Connectors

1x 16-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

2.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.2

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

8.9

6.3

Shader Model

6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

1

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce G100 OEM

2

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs ATI Radeon HD 3850 X3

3

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 X2

4

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 PCIe x1

5

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon Pro V520

6

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD FireStream 9270

7

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo

8

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 720

9

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD FirePro W4100

10

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon R7 250X

Related News

1

Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time

2

AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied

3

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

4

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

5

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

6

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

7

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

8

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

9

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

10

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower