Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 460 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

AMD Radeon RX 460 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon RX 460 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 460 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 30% (1200MHz vs 925MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 460 +13%
2.15 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2016
Release Date
Feb 2014
Arctic Islands
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1090 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
896
Shading Units
1024
56
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
2.150 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
134.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0b 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Baffin
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Baffin PRO
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy