Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 6650M vs AMD FirePro M3900

AMD Radeon RX 6650M vs AMD FirePro M3900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 6650M and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 6650M 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2416MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1632 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 120W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6650M +3507%
8.659 TFLOPS
FirePro M3900
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Oct 2010
Mobility Radeon
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2068 MHz
Base Clock
-
2416 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
160
112
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
28
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
32 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

154.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.000 GPixel/s
270.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.000 GTexel/s
17.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.659 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
541.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

120W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 23
GPU Name
Seymour
-
GPU Variant
Seymour GL
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
11.06 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
237 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy