Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 8800 XT vs AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM

AMD Radeon RX 8800 XT vs AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 8800 XT and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 340 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 8800 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 212% (2430MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (624.1GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 220W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 8800 XT +3223%
19.91 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 340 OEM
0.599 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
May 2015
Navi IV(RX 8000)
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1295 MHz
Base Clock
730 MHz
2430 MHz
Boost Clock
780 MHz
2438 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
624.1GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
384
256
TMUs
24
96
ROPs
8
-
-
-
64
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
64 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

233.3 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
622.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.72 GTexel/s
39.81 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.91 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
599.0 GFLOPS
622.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.44 GFLOPS

Board Design

220W
TDP
50W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1a3x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 48
GPU Name
Oland
Navi 48 XT
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 4.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.95 billion
Unknown
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy