Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP and 192GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 1000W)
NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1837MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 12.48GB/s)
16896 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Jan 2024
Radeon R500 AGP
Generation
Tesla Blackwell
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1665 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1837 MHz
390 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM3e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
12.48GB/s
Bandwidth
4100GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
132
-
Shading Units
16896
4
TMUs
528
4
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
50 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.09 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
969.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
248.3 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
62.08 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
31.04 TFLOPS

Board Design

41W
TDP
1000W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
Floppy
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
GB100
RV530 PRO (215CADAKA24FG)
GPU Variant
-
R500
Architecture
Blackwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
208 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
N/A
2.1
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
9.0
3.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy