Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 192GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (2130MHz vs 1837MHz)
Lower TDP (70W vs 1000W)
NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
More VRAM (192GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
14080 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
12 TFLOPS
B200 SXM 192 GB +417%
62.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Jan 2024
Quadro Ada
Generation
Tesla Blackwell
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
1665 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
1837 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM3e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
4100GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
22
SM Count
132
2816
Shading Units
16896
88
TMUs
528
48
ROPs
24
88
Tensor Cores
528
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
50 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.09 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
969.9 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
248.3 TFLOPS
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
62.08 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.04 TFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
1000W
250 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GB100
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Blackwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
208 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
9.0
6.7
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy