Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Moore Threads MTT S10

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Moore Threads MTT S10

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM MTT S10 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Moore Threads MTT S10 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +485%
12 TFLOPS
MTT S10
2.048 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Oct 2023
Quadro Ada
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
0 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
22
SM Count
2816
Shading Units
1024
88
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
64
88
Tensor Cores
22
RT Cores
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
12 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
64.00 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.096 TFLOPS
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.048 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
32.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
-
GPU Variant
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
Unknown
159 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
8.9
CUDA
6.7
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net