NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA PG506 232

VS

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation NVIDIA PG506 232

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 24GB VRAM PG506 232 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages

Released 2 years and 10 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 48% (2130MHz vs 1440MHz)

Lower TDP (70W vs 165W)

NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages

More VRAM (24GB vs 16GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)

768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

RTX 2000 Ada Generation +16%

12 TFLOPS

PG506 232

10.32 TFLOPS

RTX 2000 Ada Generation

VS

PG506 232

Graphics Card

Feb 2024

Release Date

Apr 2021

Quadro Ada

Generation

Tesla

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 4.0 x8

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz

Base Clock

930 MHz

2130 MHz

Boost Clock

1440 MHz

2000 MHz

Memory Clock

1215 MHz

Memory

16GB

Memory Size

24GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

HBM2

128bit

Memory Bus

3072bit

256.0GB/s

Bandwidth

933.1GB/s

Render Config

22

SM Count

56

-

Compute Units

-

2816

Shading Units

3584

88

TMUs

224

48

ROPs

96

88

Tensor Cores

224

22

RT Cores

-

128 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

192 KB (per SM)

12 MB

L2 Cache

24 MB

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

138.2 GPixel/s

187.4 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

322.6 GTexel/s

12.00 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

10.32 TFLOPS

12.00 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

10.32 TFLOPS

187.4 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

5.161 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107

GPU Name

GA100

-

GPU Variant

-

Ada Lovelace

Architecture

Ampere

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

5 nm

Process Size

7 nm

18.9 billion

Transistors

54.2 billion

159 mm²

Die Size

826 mm²

Board Design

70W

TDP

165W

250 W

Suggested PSU

450 W

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

No outputs

None

Power Connectors

8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

N/A

4.6

OpenGL

N/A

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

N/A

8.9

CUDA

8.0

6.7

Shader Model

N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 12 GB vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

2

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

3

NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

4

AMD Radeon 780M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

5

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation

6

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

7

AMD Radeon 780M vs NVIDIA PG506 232

8

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon RX 460 1024SP

9

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM

10

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro S7150 x2

Related News

1

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

2

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

3

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

4

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

5

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

6

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance

7

Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports

8

Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip

9

AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly

10

NVIDIA to Ramp Up Orders and Add New Suppliers to Meet Explosive Demand for Blackwell Products