NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB

VS

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation NVIDIA T400 4 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM T400 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages

Released 2 years and 9 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 49% (2130MHz vs 1425MHz)

More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)

2432 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA T400 4 GB 's Advantages

Lower TDP (30W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

RTX 2000 Ada Generation +996%

12 TFLOPS

T400 4 GB

1.094 TFLOPS

RTX 2000 Ada Generation

VS

T400 4 GB

Graphics Card

Feb 2024

Release Date

May 2021

Quadro Ada

Generation

Quadro

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 4.0 x8

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz

Base Clock

420 MHz

2130 MHz

Boost Clock

1425 MHz

2000 MHz

Memory Clock

1250 MHz

Memory

16GB

Memory Size

4GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR6

128bit

Memory Bus

64bit

256.0GB/s

Bandwidth

80.00GB/s

Render Config

22

SM Count

6

-

Compute Units

-

2816

Shading Units

384

88

TMUs

24

48

ROPs

16

88

Tensor Cores

-

22

RT Cores

-

128 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

12 MB

L2 Cache

1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

22.80 GPixel/s

187.4 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

34.20 GTexel/s

12.00 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

2.189 TFLOPS

12.00 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

1094 GFLOPS

187.4 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

34.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107

GPU Name

TU117

-

GPU Variant

-

Ada Lovelace

Architecture

Turing

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

5 nm

Process Size

12 nm

18.9 billion

Transistors

4.7 billion

159 mm²

Die Size

200 mm²

Board Design

70W

TDP

30W

250 W

Suggested PSU

200 W

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

None

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

8.9

CUDA

7.5

6.7

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 12 GB vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

2

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

3

NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

4

AMD Radeon 780M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

5

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation

6

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

7

NVIDIA T400 4 GB vs NVIDIA T1000

8

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R7 250E

9

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon RX 560 XT

10

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM

Related News

1

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

2

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

3

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

4

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

5

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

6

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

7

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

8

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

9

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

10

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance