NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 28% (2010MHz vs 1575MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+337%
12.35 TFLOPS
GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps
2.822 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Aug 2020
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
1395 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
1575 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
14
3072
Shading Units
896
96
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.40 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
88.20 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.645 TFLOPS
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.822 TFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
31W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
TU117
-
GPU Variant
N18S-G5
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
