NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

VS

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages

Released 14 years and 11 months late

Boost Clock2175MHz

Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)

5928 additional rendering cores

Lower TDP (130W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

RTX 4000 Ada Generation +4886%

26.73 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

0.536 TFLOPS

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

VS

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Graphics Card

Aug 2023

Release Date

Sep 2008

Quadro Ada

Generation

GeForce 200

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 4.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz

Base Clock

-

2175 MHz

Boost Clock

-

2250 MHz

Memory Clock

999 MHz

Memory

20GB

Memory Size

896MB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR3

160bit

Memory Bus

448bit

360.0GB/s

Bandwidth

111.9GB/s

Render Config

48

SM Count

27

-

Compute Units

-

6144

Shading Units

216

192

TMUs

72

80

ROPs

28

192

Tensor Cores

-

48

RT Cores

-

128 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

-

48 MB

L2 Cache

224 KB

Theoretical Performance

174.0 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

16.13 GPixel/s

417.6 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

41.47 GTexel/s

26.73 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

-

26.73 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

536.5 GFLOPS

417.6 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

67.07 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD104

GPU Name

GT200

-

GPU Variant

G200-103-A2

Ada Lovelace

Architecture

Tesla 2.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

5 nm

Process Size

65 nm

35.8 billion

Transistors

1.4 billion

294 mm²

Die Size

576 mm²

Board Design

130W

TDP

182W

300 W

Suggested PSU

450 W

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

2x DVI 1x S-Video

1x 16-pin

Power Connectors

2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

11.1 (10_0)

4.6

OpenGL

3.3

3.0

OpenCL

1.1

1.3

Vulkan

N/A

8.9

CUDA

1.3

6.7

Shader Model

4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

2

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

3

NVIDIA RTX A4000 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

4

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

5

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition

6

NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

7

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

8

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB

9

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon HD 3610

10

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Related News

1

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

2

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

3

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

4

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

5

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

6

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance

7

Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports

8

Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip

9

AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly

10

NVIDIA to Ramp Up Orders and Add New Suppliers to Meet Explosive Demand for Blackwell Products