CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
VS
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
5928 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 182W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+4886%
26.73 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
VS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro Ada(x000A)
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
20GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
160bit
Memory Bus
448bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
48
SM Count
27
6144
Shading Units
216
192
TMUs
72
80
ROPs
28
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
174.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Board Design
130W
TDP
182W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
GT200
-
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.3
6.8
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM
2
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
3
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R9 290X
4
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs Intel Arc Pro A60
5
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon X800 GTO
6
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+
7
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2
8
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
9
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT
10
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
Related News
1
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
2
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
3
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
4
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
5
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
6
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
7
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
8
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
9
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
10
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy