Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
6112 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +32391%
19.17 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Sep 2007
Quadro Ada
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

720 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
160bit
Memory Bus
256bit
280.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
4
6144
Shading Units
32
192
TMUs
16
80
ROPs
8
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

124.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.680 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.360 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
58.88 GFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

70W
TDP
42W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
G84-875-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
80 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy