Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS

NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9650M GS to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2025MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2016 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS 's Advantages
Lower TDP (29W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation +10267%
8.294 TFLOPS
GeForce 9650M GS
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Mar 2008
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 9M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
2025 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
4
2048
Shading Units
32
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
129.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
8.294 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.294 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
129.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
29W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
NB9P-GS1-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
80 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy