NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs Moore Threads MTT S2000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock2550MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
8704 additional rendering cores
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+512%
65.28 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S2000
10.65 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ada
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1155 MHz
Base Clock
1300 MHz
2550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
100
SM Count
-
12800
Shading Units
4096
400
TMUs
256
176
ROPs
256
400
Tensor Cores
-
100
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
72 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
448.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.8 GPixel/s
1020 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.8 GTexel/s
65.28 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.30 TFLOPS
65.28 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.65 TFLOPS
1020 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
166.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
AD102
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
Unknown
609 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5
