Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800

NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB and 4GB VRAM Quadro FX 5800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1140MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (132.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
2320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 189W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB +838%
5.837 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 5800
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

652 MHz
Base Clock
-
1140 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
512bit
132.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
30
2560
Shading Units
240
80
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

36.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
91.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
5.837 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.837 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
91.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
189W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
2x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy