NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (95W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1700MHz vs 1687MHz)
More VRAM (64GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile
8.637 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI210
+162%
22.63 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Dec 2021
Ampere-MW
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1215 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1687 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
64GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1638GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
104
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
6656
80
TMUs
416
48
ROPs
0
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
80.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
135.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
707.2 GTexel/s
8.637 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
181.0 TFLOPS
8.637 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.63 TFLOPS
135.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.63 TFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Ampere
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
6 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
N/A
