NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1687MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (95W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile
+1769%
8.637 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Nov 2008
Ampere-MW
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1215 MHz
Base Clock
-
1687 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
24
2560
Shading Units
192
80
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
24
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
80.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
135.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
8.637 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.637 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
135.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.3
6.8
Shader Model
4.0
