Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A400 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

NVIDIA RTX A400 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

We compared a Desktop platform GPU: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and a Professional market GPU: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 19% (1762MHz vs 1480MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A400
2.706 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000 +12%
3.031 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2024
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1417 MHz
Base Clock
1076 MHz
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
160bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
140.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
8
768
Shading Units
1024
24
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
40
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.20 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.72 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
47.36 GFLOPS
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.031 TFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
94.72 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
GP106
-
GPU Variant
GP106-875-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
16 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
6.1
6.8
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy