Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Max Q and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
5840 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Max Q +12236%
14.31 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Jan 2010
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

510 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
46
SM Count
6
5888
Shading Units
48
184
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

116.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
223.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
14.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
116.2 GFLOPS
223.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

80W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy