Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Mobile and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
5696 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (140W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Mobile +3722%
17.66 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
46
SM Count
24
5888
Shading Units
192
184
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
24
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
276.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
17.66 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
276.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

140W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy