Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile

NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded and 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1335MHz vs 1291MHz)
896 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.13GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Embedded +83%
5.468 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2.974 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Feb 2019
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

435 MHz
Base Clock
1291 MHz
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
1291 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
9
2048
Shading Units
1152
64
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
32
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.31 GPixel/s
85.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.95 GTexel/s
5.468 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
46.48 GFLOPS
5.468 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.974 TFLOPS
85.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.95 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
GP106
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
16 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
6.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy