Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA T400 4 GB vs AMD FireStream 9250

NVIDIA T400 4 GB vs AMD FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM T400 4 GB and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA T400 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
416 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
T400 4 GB +9%
1.094 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2021
Release Date
Jun 2008
Quadro
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

420 MHz
Base Clock
-
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

6
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
10
384
Shading Units
800
24
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

22.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
34.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy