Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2050 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.0GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 238W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2050 +111%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000
0.486 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Nov 2010
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
750 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
144.0GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
8
448
Shading Units
256
56
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

238W
TDP
142W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GF100
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
GF100-825-A3
Fermi
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy