Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro 600

NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro 600

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2050 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
352 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 238W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2050 +317%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro 600
0.246 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Dec 2010
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
144.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
2
448
Shading Units
96
56
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.560 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.24 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
245.8 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
20.48 GFLOPS

Board Design

238W
TDP
40W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GF108
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy