Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2050 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.0GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 238W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2050 +36%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Jun 2012
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
750 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
144.0GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
576
56
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.848 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.39 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
753.4 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.39 GFLOPS

Board Design

238W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GK104
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
N14E-Q1-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy