Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000

NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 and 8GB VRAM Quadro P4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P4000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (243.3GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (105W vs 238W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro P4000 +415%
5.304 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Feb 2017
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1202 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
750 MHz
Memory Clock
1901 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
144.0GB/s
Bandwidth
243.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
14
448
Shading Units
1792
56
TMUs
112
48
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
94.72 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
165.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
82.88 GFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.304 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
165.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

238W
TDP
105W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GP104
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
GP104-850-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy