Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K20s vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

NVIDIA Tesla K20s vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Tesla K20s and 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K20s 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 260W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 208.0GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K20s
2.87 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive +401%
14.38 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2013
Release Date
Aug 2018
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1305 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
320bit
Memory Bus
384bit
208.0GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
72
2496
Shading Units
4608
208
TMUs
288
40
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.90 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
149.8 GPixel/s
119.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
449.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.75 TFLOPS
2.870 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.38 TFLOPS
956.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
449.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
260W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy