Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q

NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 249.6GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K20Xm
3.935 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Max Q +263%
14.31 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Mar 2022
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
510 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
249.6GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
46
2688
Shading Units
5888
224
TMUs
184
48
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

40.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.6 GPixel/s
164.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.31 TFLOPS
3.935 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.31 TFLOPS
1312 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

235W
TDP
80W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
GA104
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy