Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2075 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M2075 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2075 +122%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Mar 2009
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
783 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
24
448
Shading Units
192
56
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
108W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GT200B
GF110-876-A1
GPU Variant
G200-835-B2
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy