Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900

NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2090 and 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M2090 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 295W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7900 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2495MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7900 +4503%
61.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Apr 2023
Tesla
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1855 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2495 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
96
16
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
6144
64
TMUs
384
48
ROPs
192
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
96
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
768 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
96 MB

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
479.0 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
958.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
122.6 TFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
61.32 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.916 TFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
295W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
Navi 31
-
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy