NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2090 and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (59W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla M2090
+656%
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1800
0.176 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Mar 2009
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
8
512
Shading Units
64
64
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
48 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
176.0 GFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
59W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
G94
-
GPU Variant
G94 GL-U
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
