Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla P6 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q

NVIDIA Tesla P6 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Tesla P6 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla P6 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1620MHz vs 1506MHz)
Lower TDP (40W vs 90W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla P6 +85%
6.169 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Max Q
3.318 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Tesla P6 +33%
95
Quadro T2000 Max Q
71
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2017
Release Date
May 2019
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1012 MHz
Base Clock
1200 MHz
1506 MHz
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1751 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
16
2048
Shading Units
1024
128
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
51.84 GPixel/s
192.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.7 GTexel/s
96.38 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.636 TFLOPS
6.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.318 TFLOPS
192.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

90W
TDP
40W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
TU117
GP104-995-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy