Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 32 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP

NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 32 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla V100 DGXS 32 GB and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370 LP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 32 GB 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (897.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
5112 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla V100 DGXS 32 GB +92076%
15.67 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 370 LP
0.017 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2018
Release Date
Nov 2008
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1297 MHz
Base Clock
-
1530 MHz
Boost Clock
-
876 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR2
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
897.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
1
5120
Shading Units
8
320
TMUs
4
128
ROPs
4
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

195.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
489.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
31.33 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.67 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.28 GFLOPS
7.834 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
25W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
G98
-
-
-
Volta
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy