Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM TITAN RTX and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA TITAN RTX 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
4392 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 280W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
TITAN RTX +2942%
16.31 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2018
Release Date
Sep 2008
GeForce 20
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1350 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
448bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
27
4608
Shading Units
216
288
TMUs
72
96
ROPs
28
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

169.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
509.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
32.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
509.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

280W
TDP
182W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
GT200
TU102-400-A1
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy