Home GPU Comparison Intel Xe DG1 SDV vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

Intel Xe DG1 SDV vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Xe DG1 SDV and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Xe DG1 SDV 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 61% (1500MHz vs 930MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
256 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
Lower TDP (65W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Xe DG1 SDV +142%
2.304 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Dec 2013
Xe Graphics
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
930 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
512
48
TMUs
32
24
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

36.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
72.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.76 GTexel/s
4.608 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.304 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
952.3 GFLOPS
576.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 3x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
Cape Verde
-
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRX
Generation 12.1
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.5 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy