Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Quadro K1200 vs Quadro FX 2700M

Quadro K1200 vs Quadro FX 2700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K1200 Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
464 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (45W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200 +806%
1151
Quadro FX 2700M
127
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
6
512
Shading Units
48
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

45W
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
G94
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM2
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy