Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Quadro K1200 vs Quadro P3200 Max Q

Quadro K1200 vs Quadro P3200 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K1200 Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 75W)
Quadro P3200 Max Q Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 25% (1404MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200
1151
Quadro P3200 Max Q +337%
5032
Blender
Quadro K1200 +1%
88
Quadro P3200 Max Q
87
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
1139 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1404 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
512
Shading Units
1792
32
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
64
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.86 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
78.62 GFLOPS
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.032 TFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GP104
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy