Home Comparison Centaur CHA vs AMD EPYC 7373X

Centaur CHA vs AMD EPYC 7373X

We compared two server CPUs: Centaur CHA with 8 cores 1.2GHz and AMD EPYC 7373X with 16 cores 3.05GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Centaur CHA 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 240W)
AMD EPYC 7373X 's Advantages
Released 121 years and 2 months late
Newer PCIe version (4 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (3.05GHz vs 1.2GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (768MB vs 16MB)
More modern manufacturing process (7nm vs 16nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Centaur CHA
786
AMD EPYC 7373X +145%
1930
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Centaur CHA
3982
AMD EPYC 7373X +295%
15766
Geekbench 5 Single Core
Centaur CHA
508
AMD EPYC 7373X +178%
1417
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
Centaur CHA
3379
AMD EPYC 7373X +637%
24913
VS

General Parameters

Jan 1901
Release Date
Mar 2022
VIA
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
CHA
Core Architecture
Milan-X
VIA Socket 2084
Socket
AMD Socket SP3
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
CHA (CNS)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 3 (Milan))

Package

-
Transistor Count
33.2 billions
16 nm
Manufacturing Process
7 nm
70 W
Power Consumption
240 W
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
195 mm²
Die Size
8x81 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
12 nm
-
I/O Die Size
416 mm²

CPU Performance

1.2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.05 GHz
2.5 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
8
Total Core Count
16
8
Total Thread Count
32
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
12.0
Multiplier
30.5
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
256 KB per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
16 MB shared
L3 Cache
768 MB shared
Yes
Unlocked Multiplier
No
-
Cores per CCD
2
2
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
4
Max Memory Channels
8
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

3
PCIe Version
4
44
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy