Home Comparison Centaur CHA vs AMD EPYC 9645

Centaur CHA vs AMD EPYC 9645

We compared two server CPUs: Centaur CHA with 8 cores 1.2GHz and AMD EPYC 9645 with 96 cores 2.3GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Centaur CHA 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 320W)
AMD EPYC 9645 's Advantages
Released 123 years and 9 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 3200)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (2.3GHz vs 1.2GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (256MB vs 16MB)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 16nm)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Jan 1901
Release Date
Oct 2024
VIA
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
CHA
Core Architecture
Turin
VIA Socket 2084
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
CHA (CNS)
Generation
EPYC(Zen 5c (Turin))

Package

-
Transistor Count
16 nm
Manufacturing Process
3 nm
70 W
Power Consumption
320 W
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
195 mm²
Die Size
mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
mm²

CPU Performance

-
Performance Cores
96
-
Performance Core Threads
192
1.2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
8
Total Core Count
96
8
Total Thread Count
192
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
12.0
Multiplier
23.0
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
80 KB per core
256 KB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
16 MB shared
L3 Cache
256 MB shared
Yes
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR5-6000
-
Max Memory Size
6 TB
4
Max Memory Channels
12
-
Max Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

-
Official Website
3
PCIe Version
5
44
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy