EPYC Embedded 8324P vs Intel Xeon W 3175X
We compared two server CPUs: EPYC Embedded 8324P with 32 cores 2.65GHz and Intel Xeon W 3175X with 28 cores 3.1GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
EPYC Embedded 8324P 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 2666)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Larger L3 cache size (128MB vs 38.5MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 14nm)
Lower TDP (180W vs 255W)
Intel Xeon W 3175X 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.1GHz vs 2.65GHz)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
EPYC Embedded 8324P
+19%
1664
Intel Xeon W 3175X
1398
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
EPYC Embedded 8324P
+81%
13349
Intel Xeon W 3175X
7335
General Parameters
Sep 2023
Release Date
Jan 2019
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Siena
Core Architecture
Skylake-W
AMD Socket SP6
Socket
Intel Socket 3647
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC(Zen 4c (Siena))
Generation
Xeon W (Skylake-W)
Package
35.5 billions
Transistor Count
8 billions
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
180 W
Power Consumption
255 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
70 °C
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
4x73 mm²
Die Size
688 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
2.65 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
3 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
32
Total Core Count
28
64
Total Thread Count
56
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
26.5
Multiplier
31.0
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
128 MB shared
L3 Cache
38.5 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR4-2666
6
Max Memory Channels
6
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
5
PCIe Version
3
96
PCIe Lanes
48
