FireStream 9250 vs Radeon PRO W7700
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 190W)
Radeon PRO W7700 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2600MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
2272 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
Radeon PRO W7700
+3095%
31950
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Nov 2023
FireStream
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2600 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
48
800
Shading Units
3072
40
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
96
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
249.6 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
499.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
63.90 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.95 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
190W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Navi 32
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Navi 32
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
28.1 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
346 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
