GeForce GT 140 OEM vs Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 140 OEM and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GT 140 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 250W)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
2240 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 140 OEM
208
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
+2653%
5728
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Apr 2017
GeForce 100
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
36
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
2304
32
TMUs
144
16
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
20.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
208.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
105W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G94B
GPU Name
Ellesmere
-
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
196 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
