GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs H3C XG310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 11% (1725MHz vs 1550MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 300W)
H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+85%
4416
H3C XG310
2381
Graphics Card
Nov 2019
Release Date
Nov 2020
GeForce 16
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s
Render Config
20
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
DG1
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
12 nm
Process Size
10 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
Unknown
284 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
