Quadro FX 1700 vs Quadro P5200 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 100W)
Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1747MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2528 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
59
Quadro P5200 Mobile
+15061%
8945
Graphics Card
Sep 2007
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1557 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1747 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
20
32
Shading Units
2560
16
TMUs
160
8
ROPs
64
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
111.8 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
279.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
139.8 GFLOPS
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.945 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
279.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
42W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
GP104
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
