Quadro FX 360M vs Tesla K20c
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 225W)
Tesla K20c 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (5GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
2480 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 360M
26
Tesla K20c
+13453%
3524
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
5GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
320bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
2496
8
TMUs
208
4
ROPs
40
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.71 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
146.8 GTexel/s
25.60 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.524 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1175 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G86
GPU Name
GK110
NB8M-GLM
GPU Variant
GK110-885-KA-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1