Home Comparison Quadro M2000 vs RTX A5500 Max Q

Quadro M2000 vs RTX A5500 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 80W)
RTX A5500 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1260MHz vs 1163MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
6656 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1786
RTX A5500 Max Q +947%
18710
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
585 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
1260 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
58
768
Shading Units
7424
48
TMUs
232
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
232
-
RT Cores
58
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
121.0 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
292.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.71 TFLOPS
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
18.71 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
292.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
80W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GA103
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
22 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
496 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy