Quadro NVS 290 vs Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 2400W)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
16368 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
29
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+180693%
52430
Graphics Card
Oct 2007
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro NVS
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1565 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
128GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
3205GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
16384
8
TMUs
1024
4
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
16 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
Theoretical Performance
1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS
Board Design
21W
TDP
2400W
200 W
Suggested PSU
2800 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
G86
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
80 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
100 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
